Subject: WSOP not the world championship unless everyone gets to play. Date: 22 Apr 2001 15:48:25 GMT From: abloch@alum.mit.edu Organization: NewsOne.Net - Free Usenet News via the Web - http://newsone.net/ Newsgroups: rec.gambling.poker Followup-To: rec.gambling.poker I flew out to Las Vegas for two weeks to play in the WSOP, and had plans to return for the final event. But when I heard that Binion's had kicked out Paul Phillips, I immediately decided not to patronize Binions and posted my decision on the BARGE and TARGET lists. I now reiterate my boycott here. My decision was based on free speech. For those players who continue to play at Binion's: even if you don't care enough about free speech to boycot the WSOP, you should think about staying away from Binion's, because any victory will forever be tarnished Imagine if the PGA barred Tiger Woods and other top tournament pros from the PGA Championship in August, just for talking with a reporter about a controversial change in the compensation of tournament personnel. The PGA might try to call the winner the "world champion" of golf for 2001, but golf fans wouldn't be fooled. The equivalent of the PGA Championship in the world of poker is the Championship Event of the World Series of Poker. And, less than a month before the Championship, the Horseshoe management has started banning top contenders merely for speaking to reporters about how money coming from players' tournament entries should be divided amongst tournament personnel. No doubt, the Horseshoe Casino would like to call the winner of the WSOP Championship Event this year's "World Champion." But you shouldn't be fooled. The Horseshoe has barred Paul Phillips and Richard Tatalovich. Who's next? Binion's advertising boasts that "anyone over 21 years of age can enter and compete," but, apparently, Binion's has their own flexible definition of "anyone," much like their flexible definition of "tournament personnel" that Phillips and Tatalovich complained of. Lest you think that barring Phillips and Tatalovich will have little effect, these are two strong players who have recent major No Limit wins. In February, Phillips took first place and $55,500 in a No Limit event at the Commerce Casino's LA Poker Classic, and followed it up with second place for $95,950 in the LA Poker Classic Championship final 6 days later. In December, Richard Tatalovich won $318,000 in the final event of the U.S. Poker Championship held at the Taj Mahal. Both players have won or put in top money finishes in several other major tournaments this past year and are arguably two of the top favorites to win the WSOP Championship Event. Both are probably underrated by many other top players. Many other entrants from previous years and other poker players are refusing to enter WSOP events or play any game at the Horseshoe, shocked at the retaliation against Phillips and Tatalovich for exercising their freedom of speech in a reasonable manner. But many poker players are continuing to remain at the WSOP, aparently enough unphased by these events that their desire for fame, fortune, or just some action makes playing at the WSOP still worthwhile. To these poker players I ask: Without Phillips, Tatalovich, and many other top players, will the winner of this year's "Championship Event" really be a World Champion? What if last year's champion, Chris Ferguson, also refuses to play? Can a tournament be called a world championship if top contenders are barred for illegitimate reasons, and other top contenders refuse to enter? The answer is No. Yes, Binion's Horseshoe Casino owns the rights to the words "World Series of Poker". Yes, the casino can call the final event the "World Championship" and even decide who plays. But, to most of the rest of the poker world, this year's "World Championship" will be just like any other poker tournament, if not less prestigious. This year's winner may win more money than in other tournaments, but, with 2 challengers barred from playing and many others staying away, this year's winner cannot be called a champion. You can't have a world champion unless the world is invited. Right now, the world champion is Chris Ferguson, with Tatalovich next in line, and the same will be true after the WSOP unless Phillips and Tatalovich both play. Anyone playing at the WSOP for fun or just hoping to get lucky should find someplace else to play -- the Bellagio, Mirage, or other casino in or out of Las Vegas are all more pleasant, and more responsive and tolerant to criticism. Anyone planning to play the WSOP for fame should realize that this year's prize isn't fame but shame. And any serious players who can afford not to play should realize it is in their best interests to sit these events out. If these players left, the only players remaining would be pros who desperately need the earnings from the WSOP. Good luck beating each other, and the increased house rake. Andrew Bloch abloch@alum.mit.edu ----- Posted via NewsOne.Net: Free (anonymous) Usenet News via the Web ----- http://newsone.net/ -- Free reading and anonymous posting to 60,000+ groups NewsOne.Net prohibits users from posting spam. If this or other posts made through NewsOne.Net violate posting guidelines, email abuse@newsone.net